top of page

WHAT IS THE ANTI-DIET TREND?

Aug 31
4 min read

Does the Anti-Diet Movement Mean We’re Encouraging Unhealthy Behaviours?



More and more people are becoming familiar with concepts like intuitive eating (you may have heard me talk about it once or twice before... ha) and the anti-diet approach. And I am SO glad we are finally having these conversations.


We’re becoming more aware of diet culture and the impact it has had on our relationship with food, our bodies, and our health. We’re recognizing the damage that generations of restrictive diets, food rules, weight-loss messaging, and “good food/bad food” thinking have caused (and continue to cause, even among some of our youngest eaters!).


But with so much nutrition talk happening on social media, it is incredibly easy for messages to become distorted. One misconception I see often is that being anti-diet means being anti-nutrition. In other words: “I don't care about nutrition. I'm just going to eat whatever I want, whenever I want". That’s not what the anti-diet approach is about at all.


So, what exactly is diet culture?


Diet culture is a system of beliefs that teaches us that certain bodies are more desirable than others and that we should control, restrict, or manipulate what we eat in an attempt to achieve a particular body size or definition of “health" (and it can be surprisingly sneaky!).


For example, diet culture tells us that carbohydrates need to be “earned.” That eating dessert is “being bad.” That we should ignore our hunger because it isn't time to eat yet. That certain foods are “clean” while others are unhealthy. That enjoying foods containing sugar, salt or fat is something we should feel guilty about rather than a completely normal part of being human.


Over time, we can become so accustomed to following external food rules that we stop listening to the information coming from our own bodies.


Think about how babies eat: when a baby is hungry, they let us know. When they've had enough, they stop eating. They aren't counting calories, worrying about carbohydrates or wondering whether they “deserve” another serving.


Of course, eating becomes more complex as we get older. We have schedules, responsibilities, medical needs, food availability, preferences and nutrition knowledge to consider. But somewhere along the way, many of us also learn that our bodies cannot be trusted when it comes to food. And that's where things can get complicated.


Restriction isn't always about what we actually eat


When we talk about restriction, we often think about physically avoiding certain foods.

I'm not going to eat bread anymore. I'm cutting out sugar. I'm not allowed to have chips in the house.


But restriction can also happen mentally: maybe you eat the cookie, but then spend the next hour feeling guilty about it. Maybe you tell yourself you'll “be good tomorrow". Maybe you compensate by eating less later or exercising more. Or maybe you feel like you've already blown it, so you might as well keep eating. In other words, you may technically be allowing yourself to eat the food, while still experiencing all of the guilt and anxiety that comes with believing you shouldn't be eating it.


Neither version creates a particularly peaceful relationship with food. And this is one of the biggest problems with diet culture: it costs us an enormous amount of time, energy and money trying to follow food rules that are often unrealistic or unsustainable in the first place.


So what does “anti-diet” actually mean?


Rejecting diet culture does not mean rejecting nutrition. It means moving away from rigid external rules and toward a way of eating that considers your body, your preferences, your health, your circumstances and your nutrition knowledge.


An anti-diet approach can look like:

  1. TRUSTING your hunger and fullness cues and recognizing that your body communicates valuable information to you.

  2. ALLOWING yourself to eat foods that bring you pleasure and satisfaction without automatically labelling them as “good,” “bad,” “healthy” or “unhealthy.”

  3. USING nutrition knowledge to care for your body and choose nourishing foods — without turning that knowledge into another set of strict rules.


And that's an important distinction. Nutrition still matters. Eating fruits and vegetables matters. Fibre matters. Protein matters. Eating regularly matters. Our food choices can absolutely influence our health. But how we think and feel about food matters too.


There is a big difference between eating vegetables because you know they help you feel good and support your health, and forcing yourself to eat vegetables because you believe eating anything else makes you “bad.”


There is a difference between choosing a balanced breakfast because it gives you energy for your morning, and choosing the lowest-calorie breakfast because you feel like you need to control your body. The food might even look similar from the outside. The relationship with food underneath it can be completely different.


Relearning how to trust ourselves


The ability to listen to and trust our bodies can become quieter after years of dieting, restriction and external food rules. But it can also be rebuilt.


An anti-diet approach isn't about throwing nutrition knowledge out the window. It's about combining that knowledge with internal cues, personal preferences, flexibility, satisfaction and real life. Because a healthy relationship with food isn't one where you make the “perfect” choice every time.


It's one where food doesn't constantly require guilt, fear, calculation or compensation.

Rejecting diet culture doesn't mean rejecting health.


There is room for both nourishment and enjoyment, and they don't have to compete with each other.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page